Re: Games Discussion Thread
I don't get that though... does it really work?
I mean, if I want pizza, then someone hands me a salad and says "Here's your pizza!", I'm not going to be all "Yay! pizza!".
I don't have the highest opinion of the rest of our species, but are they really that dumb as a general rule?
Yes
Yes they are
"4G" in mobile phone networks is your example case here.
People wanted 4G because 4G was a standard for how fast networks are supposed to be. Like a benchmark of sorts. It technically means being able to transmit at 1000Mbit/s(Or 125MB/s) when not moving or only moving slowly.
The current networks marketed as being "4G" are actually just 3G with some updates(Except ONE in south korea, which is actually 4G), but since all phone companies started claiming being 4G the official definition was changed from being a measurement of speed to being the "Fourth Generation", and thus being "4G" and legally allowed to be marketed as being such.
A similar thing here, except without the official standards. As there are no official standards of VR, these "VR" headsets can be marketed as such and there is nothing anyone can do to call them out on not being virtual reality. Since Virtual Reality is not a solid term with (legally applicable) definitions. You can be sold a rock and told it's a "VR rock", and you can not really say it isn't a VR rock, just a rock. Since there is no official definition as to what makes a VR into VR.
In your analogy, it would be like having pizza constructed by scientists and shown to the public as a concept. Then companies started selling bread with tomato sauce in it and going "These are pizzas. Enjoy!"
Technically dough and tomato sauce are part of a pizza, and there is no legal definition of a pizza in this example case. So they are fully allowed to claim this and nobody except the people who were into pizza and pizza science before it became public would know the difference, and if you explain it to people most won't care or feel like getting a pizza as shown in the concept idea would be way too advanced for humanity and so we should be 'happy with what we can get'.
Marketing is the art of telling lies and making people happy about it. Long enough to get their money anyway
--
But my own stance on it is
Let me know when they have tacile simulation. Only then will I consider them to be even remotely close to VR.
Putting on a headset and placing some computer screens really close to the eyes is not an innovation, it's just the same sensory output that we are used to from digital machines applied in a slightly different way.