- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 11,239
- Reputation score
- 1,017
I don't understand the logic. Are you saying it's pointless to sue you because disagreements won't change anyone's mind? I never said I was trying to change your mind, I'm talking about damage done sir. That's like if you went out and beat up a black guy and said, "Disagreements about racism will always exist, so this behavior will always be ok."
You sir, are a racist.
And I object on the grounds that four previous supreme court cases have already established the taste of victory is, in fact, salty.
Your client is free to sue the one who attacked him, but he still suggested the abolishment of our rep system, which has become a religious power in these forums. So, to suggest that the rep system be thrown out can be considered a violation of the Constitution.
However, if the rep system's messiah were to declare that rep is not a religion, then Toxic's case will be dismissed.
You have until I get bored to obtain this declaration, else I'll have no choice but to rule in favor of Mrs. Shock.
Court is adjourned. *slams hammer*