Re: Wolf's Dungeon
Mostly because of disease, likely injury to human or animal, also religious taboo.[...]
Does it spread disease? Not sarcasm -- I legitimately don't know. I wouldn't think it would.
Raping animals is a no-go, yeah. If it damages them or they don't want to, it's weak sauce. But when it's just a girl bending over and a dog willingly mounting her? Dog's having a blast. And if she is too, good for her. I don't see a victim or negative outcome from that sort of beastiality. That's what I'm getting at -- scat, loli, and guro all have the potential to inflict harm on others, as they encourage harmful behaviors (interacting with doo doo, endangering youths, and... well, gore). I don't see how beastality can harm others. Saying that rape beastiality (ie. a man fucking a goat that doesn't like it) is why beastality is illegal, is like saying that sex should be illegal because rape happens. When I say beastiality, it's implied that I don't mean rape beastiality.
I just want to elaborate so that people don't misunderstand or misconstrue what I said. I don't intend to start an ethical discussion here, as it'd detract from the thread (since people are terrified of polarizing conversations).
I legitimately don't understand what is contradictory here.
[...]I wont' force you for my referrences nor try to explain the morality of my taste.[...]
What does that have to do with me stating my opinion of yours? If you put yourself in a public forum, your presence implies that you are prepared to be analyzed and scrutinized by others. I have just as much of a right to examine your tastes as you have a right to have them.