Re: Agent Alona (Combin Ation Game)
Nah never said my qualifications were more valid even for paying to help the guy make his games. Just pointing out the fact that you've obviously got some interest in the games he makes even if you don't want to admit it. Excuses are excuses.
Why are you even still trying?
Like, let me link you to the
You must be registered to see the links
real fast.
Are you telling me that your previous posts weren't essentially trumpeting your ability to pay for the game over mine? Let's put this here:
He asked for feedback from those that have donated, not from the moochers. You obviously aren't someone that would contribute to the "betterment" of his games.
I try to keep it civil, but this is giving me a headache trying to keep it in, so I'll just say it:
How stupid are you?
Regardless, I gave a clear review of the game and the aspects that were unsatisfactory to me. If you want me to link that, I'll gladly do it. Also:
(to be fair, yes, I like corruption and exhibitionism, and I do like the way he implemented them into the game)
means what it means. I like the way that he implemented it. But this does NOT redeem the game from an overall negative rating. You know that there's been two updated versions of the RPGmaker engine right and that RPG Maker VXAce just went for slightly under half of this game's price this past holiday season on Steam right? Nah, you didn't.
The main point is that there are very few English game makers so why throw out discouraging comments over such trivial details. Just don't use your "qualifying" review of the game while its still in the development stage to justify the fact you've gotten half of this game for free, and his prior game, and the one before that. You're obviously interested in his games, why not go to his blog and share your critique there, maybe you can donate for the games of his you've played so far while you're there.
So the fact he's using a 10 year-old game engine is
trivial? The fact that combat is a bit odd (pulling down someone's skirt does more damage than punching the victim in the gut I suppose)? The fact that over a few years there's no noticeable improvement of the graphics used or the oddball plot?
Okay, the combat and the plot part can be forgiven. It's an H-game, its measure of success is the fappability.
My "interest" in the game consists of me getting severely irritated by more than a few people acting like the creator is the Messiah and that every wound he suffers is a wound upon yourselves, and from there deciding to play the game that you people are so stridently defending as being sacred. So I did and I ended up finding more faults than pluses, though there are pluses. So it goes.
Please don't "let me have it"
Breh I just did.