What's new

Interesting article on how Google Translate has improved


szarala

Tentacle God
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
1,878
Reputation score
67
Wordy, but an interesting read in the NY Times

 
Re: Interesting article on how Google Translate has improved

Could still improve. It has particular trouble with names and other nouns.

Say what you will about English, but capitalization is helpful for programs.
 
Re: Interesting article on how Google Translate has improved

I dunno what this thread is doing here... but here's my 2 cents on google translate in one image...
pivBMCk.png
 
Re: Interesting article on how Google Translate has improved

I dunno what this thread is doing here.

Relevant because Google tends to be the machine translation of choice for projects that utilize them, and this article gives interesting insight into how it works and how it's evolving, which in turn can let those doing translations and using machine help to make better informed decisions about it.
 
Last edited:
Re: Interesting article on how Google Translate has improved

Gotta say, Google online gives a -sometimes significantly- better translation quite a few times in Translation Aggregator, than Atlas or LEC does, sadly.

Even with Atlas and TA all properly set up, with the script and TAHelper. Maybe a switch to VNR is in order...

Anywho, Google takes a couple milliseconds more, and hell if I would want some effed up h-scene to go through it from my computer, though... xD
 
Re: Interesting article on how Google Translate has improved

Google's a quick and dirty for Partials as there isn't much context to get bogged down in.
Personally, I also pass text through things like imTranslator, honyaku and I've recently started using Jisho and rikaichan.

But yeah. Google seems to be taking steps forward.
 
Re: Interesting article on how Google Translate has improved

AI wars coming up. Better get the bunker ready.
 
Re: Interesting article on how Google Translate has improved

Gotta say, Google online gives a -sometimes significantly- better translation quite a few times in Translation Aggregator, than Atlas or LEC does, sadly.
I only use Google when Atlas gives gibberish and I'm interested in pursuing further. In those cases, I haven't seen much, if any, improvement.

But that will eventually change, of course, as the Atlas database is static and unchanging in a limited space on my machine while Google has virtually unbounded growth potential.
 
Back
Top